top of page

Instructional Design in Online Learning

What's it all about?

Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.

Designing instruction is something that educators do daily in order to help their students learn. Designing online instruction, however, is slightly different. The teaching is still based on the same principles, but the teacher and students are not physically in the same place. Teachers use a Learning Management System (LMS) to develop an online course that creates significant learning environments. The learning environment, however, is online. This presents challenges as educators still need to apply appropriate learning theories, align instruction/activities/assessments, and meet curriculum standards and expectations while connecting with students to help them develop a lifelong love of learning as critical thinkers and problem solvers.

Lesson planning and unit planning are aspects of teaching I do daily, but course development is not an everyday occurrence. I use blended learning in my classroom, but I have never gone completely online. It will be important for me to remember that an online course may have a different delivery method, but the teaching itself should more or less be structured the same way as being in a classroom. Using Gagne's Nine Events of Instruction will help me focus on what an online course should look like and ensure that I have the necessary components for student engagement and success.

 

As I develop an online course for fourth graders based on my innovation plan and CSLE, I will be documenting my journey each week here and on the blog. Like we tell our students, process is just as important as (if not more important than) product. This is a look at the process behind my course development. 

ON

THE

BLOG

Drawing by Sylvia Duckworth

Week 1: Instructional Design & Learning Theories

Pre-Planning: To get started in developing an online course, I started thinking about background information to help me plan.

  • Applying backwards design - Using the 3 Column Table and UbD to create significant learning environments

  • Learning theories - Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, Connectivism (reviewed in video and discussed on the blog)

  • Teaching style - teacher as facilitator, STREAM, COVA, digital learning, based in Constructivism and Connectivism (Teaching Philosophy)

  • Learners - 4th grade students in suburban Pennsylvania (Learning Philosophy)

  • Online teaching experience - I have experience with blended learning as a teacher and student, but have only experienced a completely online course as a student. My LMS experience is limited to Google Classroom and BlackBoard.

  • Technology experience and comfort - I personally use technology constantly, and as a teacher I incorporate it when appropriate so that my students can create rather than absorb. (Digital Learning in My Classroom

  • Content experience and comfort - The online course will be based on a Project Lead the Way engineering unit. Although I have taught engineering with simple machines as a science unit for a few years in my self-contained fourth grade classroom, PLTW is a new program for me.

Planning: Introduction, Learning Goals, Desired Results, Audience, Outline

  • Introduction - As part of science curriculum, students study engineering in regards to machines. They learn about forces, simple machines, compound/complex machines, and magnetic interactions.

  • Learning Goal - Learners will evaluate a problem and create a structure that rescues a tiger from a moat based on their exploration of simple machines and engineering in order to recognize that they are real engineers who can solve unique problems.

  • Desired Results - Learners will apply the engineering design process to create a complex machine to solve a problem. They will reflect on the use of the engineering design process outside of this unique situation on their ePortfolios. 

  • Audience - 4th grade students

  • Outline - Please click here for the full outline.

    • Week 1 - ​Introduction to Forces

    • Week 2 - Simple Machines and Forces

    • Week 3 - Forces and Interactions in Compound Machines

    • Week 4 - Magnetic Interactions

    • Week 5 - Animal Rescue

Supporting Documents

Completed UbD

LearningDctr. (2010, June 17).  Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism & learning and instructional theory [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YOqgXjynd0

3 Column Table

Week 2: Assessment and Activities

As I continue to develop my Engineering with Simple Machines online course for fourth grade students, I worry about them spending too much time online and not balancing their online time with other activities. There are so many digital distractions out there, for both children and adults, so I recognize that my students may have difficulty staying focused on the learning. 

Because of this, how I develop my activities and assessments is critical. All learning activities and assessments should be engaging and aligned. My students need to be given choice so that they can take ownership of their work. They can prove their learning in ways besides a standard multiple choice test. There are a variety of online tools available, so it is important to use them in a way that allows students to be creators. In order to balance digital activities with non-digital activities, when students build machines they will be given a choice to use an online program or physical materials. 

 

TPACK helps educators find balance between content, pedagogy, and technology. Unlike the SAMR framework or the Technology Integration Matrix, TPACK finds the sweet spot of all three components rather than just focusing on technology. This is where true innovation occurs (Olmanson, 2014). 

 

In short, my thoughts for this week are:

  1. Students need to balance online time with time outside of the Internet.

  2. Teachers need to align assessments and activities while keeping them engaging and authentic.

  3. TPACK is the answer to thoughts 1 and 2.

age of distraction.jpg

Learning Fundamentals. (2013). How to focus in the age of distraction [Digital image]. Retrieved from https://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/social-network/how-to-focus-in-the-age-of-distraction/

Olmanson, J. (2014, May 29). Thinking about classroom technology integration via the TPACK framework [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPoqKg5KOo8

point side.png

Week 3: Course Design Tool

Schoology Logo.jpg

I have decided to use Schoology, a learning management system (LMS) to develop my online course. Schoology is user friendly for both teachers and students. It offers many tools and organizational features to help teachers structure their courses. In working with Schoology, I have realized that it is superior (in my opinion) to Google Classroom as a LMS. Although Google Classroom is not labeled as a LMS, many educators use it as one. In working with Schoology, however, I have realized that I like Google Classroom for basic link sharing and assignment submission, but Schoology far exceeds Google Classroom for complete online course development. Schoology gives teachers more creative license to develop a course that suits their specific needs. This is critical because selecting an instructional design model that suits the course leads to success.

I have also been thinking about various aspects of developing my online course. These are some questions I've been pondering in my instructional design.

 

  • How will you ensure the success of your learners in this course? I will ensure the success of my learners through developing relationships with them, communicating with them, and providing feedback.

  • What do you want learners to know and be able to do when they have completed your course? I want learners to know how to use the engineering design process to solve problems. I want them to be able to recognize their success but identify areas for improvement in their engineering abilities.

  • How will you determine that they have reached the goal and objectives you have set? I will determine that goals and objectives have been met through project presentations, conclusion questions, and reflection on ePortfolios.

  • What resources will your learners need for your course? My learners will need internet access, headphones (if desired for listening), any available building materials, and a growth mindset.

  • Where will you put them? I have organized materials into folders on Schoology, each folder being for a week of the course.

  • How will learners access the resources? Learners will access the resources through folders on Schoology, and some resources will be found around their home.

  • How will you divide or “chunk” the learning activities into meaningful increments to help learners build or scaffold their learning? Learning has been divided into 5 weeks. Week 1 – Introduction to Forces, Week 2 – Simple Machines and Forces, Week 3 – Compound Machines and Force, Week 4 – Magnetic Interactions, Week 5 -  Animal Rescue; Each week builds upon the previous week, adding a new component to engineering and eventually creating a machine to solve a problem.

  • How will you integrate readings, videos, discussions, and activities for meaningful learning Within each folder the week, there will be a discussion and learning activities. Some weeks will have videos, some weeks will have readings, and some weeks will have both. They are all connected to the topic that week.

  • What active learning experiences will you provide for your learners? My learners will be engineers as they design and build machines. Although some activities are completely online, students will also have the opportunity to be actively learning offline.

  • What will your assessment (both formative and summative) look like? Formative Assessments – Weeks 1 through 4 end with conclusion questions. These are open-ended questions based on learning that week, so students can show their learning in their own words. Flipgrid is also used as a formative assessment in weeks 2 and 3. Additionally, students will be reflecting on their ePortfolios. Summative Assessment – Students create a machine based on what they learned. Then, they create a product (of their choice) to share their process and findings. This is then posted to their ePortfolios.

Week 4: Course Implementation

The time has come now for me to put everything together (activities, assessments, materials, etc.) with instructions for student use. My main goal has been to let my personality and teaching style shine through and be evident, even if students are not physically with me. I wanted everything to be clear so that students would not have many questions, but to also let them know that I am always available for questions. The course CAN be completed completely online without a teacher in-person (although some activities are not online), but in my classroom I will be using a blended learning format to implement the course. 

A non-interactive version of the course is to the right. I wanted my students to feel comfortable in their learning environment and recognize that they matter in my online classroom. I have incorporated a variety of media such as images, videos, and readings. The course also offers a student lounge where students can communicate with each other, as well as an initial discussion post to get to know their classmates on a more personal level. The course has been divided into five weeks, and each week contains a variety of media and activities/assessments that match the constructivist and connectivist perspectives.

Some other aspects I have been pondering are:

  • Will learners need training on how to use the course management tool? - Learners may need some support, but it is easy to navigate with limited technology skills.

  • How will you provide that? - I will introduce Schoology to my students and be available for questions as the course continues.

  • How is your system managed/filtered for learners? - Learners must have a code to access the course, so only students that are given the code may enter. Additionally, I have carefully selected all materials to ensure that they are appropriate and effective. When students are to research on their own, I recommended sites to ensure their safety online.

  • Will learners be involved in individual or collaborative projects? - If learners take the course completely online, their projects will be individual unless they have a classmate nearby. When I implement the course as a blended learning model, students will be working collaboratively in my classroom.

  • How and where will they submit assignments? - Students will submit assignments to Schoology. Assignments have been labeled, and submission details have been included.

  • Will the pacing or your course be the same for everyone or will you have self-pacing? - The course is meant to be 5 weeks, but students can start at any time and work through at a pace that suits their needs.

  • How will you communicate with learners? - I will communicate with learners through email, discussion boards, and by phone.

  • If your learners are K-12, how will parents be involved? - Being that my course is meant for 4th graders, I received permission from Schoology to create it. Parents are welcome to view the course with their child, sign up for a parent account through Schoology, and view their child’s ePortfolio. They may need to assist their child throughout the course and are welcome to communicate with me as needed.

  • How will you update your course? - After a set of students take the course, I will ask for feedback and make adjustments as needed. I will also update if any problems occur along the way, such as a typing error or a broken link.

My next step is to create more online/blended courses. Two of my ideas are:

4th Grade Social Studies - Pennsylvania

  • PA Geography

  • Native Americans of PA

  • Early European Explorers

  • William Penn and the New Colony

  • French and Indian War

4th Grade ELA - Figurative Language

  • Types - adage, allusion, alliteration, hyperbole, idiom, irony, metaphor, onomatopoeia, personification, proverb, simile​​

  • Using figurative language in writing (especially poetry) and speaking

Both of these would be appropriate online courses because the media available for these topics is extremely useful. For example, a video of the French and Indian War is more authentic than a textbook reading. These are also great topics for individualization. For social studies, some students come in with more background knowledge. For ELA, some students have more background knowledge, and students tend to favor particular types of figurative language. These topics could lead to the ideal combination of content, technology, and pedagogy.

Week 5: Reflection & Analysis of Online Learning

When I was a child in elementary school, online learning was becoming more common and taking off as the Internet and electronic devices as we know them were being created. Each classroom had a computer or two, but we mostly played games like Oregon Trail. By middle school, electronic devices were becoming more common. People had flip phones and email accounts. I would message my friends online after school on my dial-up Internet, but as a student I was still not getting the opportunity to actually learn with technology. In high school, we had a few more computers and used them for research projects, typing papers, and remediation like Study Island. Still, all learners were not given the opportunity to truly learn online. By college, I was taking online courses using BlackBoard and Angel at Penn State University. Technology grew as I did, and I was finally getting the chance to learn online. Now, as an educator and technology leader, I have the opportunity to incorporate online learning to better my own students’ learning opportunities.

 

When developing an online course, it is important to consider Instructional Design theories and models. Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism are the main learning theories, and connectivism adds a modern element. Behaviorism and cognitivism tend to be based on traditional, teacher-centered instruction. Following behaviorism, students learn for external rewards such as grades, whereas in cognitivism students memorize and regurgitate content. Both of these should not be completely removed from modern education, but constructivism and connectivism are what educators should be using to develop online courses. Tony Bates (2016) suggests that knowledge management is an important skill because both academic knowledge and skills-based knowledge are needed to succeed. That is where the constructivism and connectivism theories connect with modern education. Students are encouraged to reflect and connect as they make sense of their learning experiences and solve problems (LearningDctr, 2010). My course, Engineering with Simple Machines, is based heavily on constructivism as students are making connections and making sense of their own learning.

 

Instructional Design models are also important to consider. Popular online learning frameworks include ADDIE, IDOL, Rapid Instructional Design, Rapid Prototyping, and Dick, Carey, & Carey (Morrison, 2013). The framework guides the structure of the course, so it is important to choose the best one for each specific course. My course most closely utilizes the Dick, Carey, & Carey model with influences from the Instructional Design for Online Learning IDOL framework because the learner is active throughout the learning process, and I carefully considered pedagogy.

 

Also important in creating an online course is considering activities and assessments. The Understanding by Design template helps educators plan out learning to ensure that all outcomes, activities, and assessment are aligned. In my UbD plan I pre-planned my online course by considering desired results, assessment evidence, and the learning plan. More specific aspects that I planned for the course include goals, standards, understandings, essential questions, performance tasks, and a summary of learning activities. Creating the UbD plan allowed me to use backwards design to make sure my course would meet the needs of my learners and be instructionally appropriate and effective. As I developed my online course, I referred to my UbD plan to make sure I was on the right path in creating authentic learning experiences for students. The UbD plan should always be a step in planning an online course.

 

Considering theories and models and pre-planning an online course takes time and effort, but it is worth it. Today’s students need online learning in some form so that they can be successful and become lifelong learners. Modern education must be student-centered as a way to create significant learning environments where learners have choice, ownership, and voice as they are given authentic learning experiences. In the 21st century, educators are responsible for helping their students develop 21st century skills such as a collaboration, communication, critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, and innovation as students need to be prepared to be lifelong learners and learn HOW to learn. Online learning, whether completely online, blended, or another form, personalizes learning to help students develop these 21st century skills and be successful. We are preparing our students for jobs that don’t even exist yet. We are teaching for the future, so our methods cannot be stuck in the past.

 

Overall, online learning is what the teacher makes of it. Computers should not completely replace teachers, so it is up to the educator to determine how to best incorporate technology and online learning for their students. Balance is everything. Students need to balance online time with time outside of the Internet. Teachers need to balance content, pedagogy, and technology to transform instruction to meet the needs of today’s students. Technology is just a tool like anything else. It is HOW the educator uses the tool that makes a difference.

 

References

 

Bates, T. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates. Retrieved from https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/teaching-in-a-digital-age_2016.pdf

 

LearningDctr. (2010, June 17).  Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism & learning and instructional theory [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YOqgXjynd0

 

Morrison, D. (2013, May 28). “Start here:” Instructional design models for online courses. Retrieved from https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/start-here-instructional-design-models-for-online-courses/

thinking bar.png

Successful Online Programs

*all planning questions*

bottom of page